Release: Benchmarking improvements and DuckDB comparison#85
Conversation
cloudSQL vs DuckDB comparison using TPC-H-inspired queries: - Q1: Aggregation with GROUP BY (lineitem scan) - Q6: Scan with filter (discount + quantity predicate) - Q3-like: Simple hash join (orders + lineitem) Benchmark measures items/sec at 10k and 100k row scales.
- benchmarks/duckdb_comparison_bench.cpp: TPC-H-inspired benchmarks (Q1 GROUP BY, Q6 filter+aggregate, Q3-like join) at 10k/100k scales - CMakeLists.txt: conditional DuckDB linking via find_package - docs/performance/DUCKDB_COMPARISON.md: detailed findings report Key results: - cloudSQL wins filter+aggregate (Q6): 2.7x-4.5x faster - DuckDB dominates GROUP BY (Q1): 385x-1196x faster - DuckDB leads on joins: 9x-18x faster
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
1 participant
Summary
Key Benchmark Findings
Test plan